| |
G4XNH > DEBATE 17.05.06 22:16l 52 Lines 1448 Bytes #999 (0) @ GBR
BID : CE3174G4XNH
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re: G4XNH and opposing wars
Path: ON0AR<F6KMO<KP4IG<VE2PKT<VE1DRG<K0KCC<AA5JJ
Sent: 060513/1242z @:AA5JJ.AA5JJ.#NEOK.OK.USA.NOAM [Muskogee, OK.] #:31540 $:CE
Message-Id: <CE3174G4XNH@aa5jj.bbs>
Sender: g4xnh@aa5jj.aa5jj.#neok.ok.usa.noam
>From: g4xnh@aa5jj.aa5jj.#neok.ok.usa.noam
From: G4XNH@GB7YKS.#19.GBR.EU
To : DEBATE@GBR
Andy, G0FTD wrote:-
> G4XNH wrote:-
>> I am totally against warfare when sound debate is better
>
> I agree, but sound debate is not always possible or a success.
I agree. Hence the maxim. Walk softly, with a big stick. A good defence is
to have a sound one.
> To simply claim that all war is wrong regardless is mistaken folly on the
> part of those claiming it.
I never wrote that of course so you must have been alluding to another.
I agree. In some cases, when sound and reasoned debate is impossible, it
often leads to more drastic steps.
My meaning was that sound debate should always come first second and
third. Only if debate totally should one consider taking less friendly
steps.
Regardless of one's desire for peace, there are some in this world who
will never debate and so make war inevitable. Aggression is not a good
thing and must be the very last step.
Sadly, history repeats again and again and lessons are not learned. Or
rather they are, but only to gain an upper hand. Man creates war. Sadly, I
believe that as long as man exists there will be wars.
73 - Jeff, G4XNH @ GB7YKS
Brightraven94@Hotmail.com
Interests. Historical research, dowsing and reading.
Message timed: 16:27 on 2006-May-12
Message sent using WinPack-Telnet V6.80
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
