| |
G4UEQ > FREQ 10.01.06 11:00l 18 Lines 606 Bytes #999 (0) @ GBR
BID : 55040_GB7SYP
Read: GUEST
Subj: Re:Mcs/Mhz
Path: ON0AR<F6KMO<KP4IG<XE1FH<JE7YGF<7M3TJZ<F6CDD<CE8FGC<WU3V<KA0MOS<K0KCC
Sent: 060110/0624z @:K0KCC.#SWMO.MO.USA.NOAM [K0KCC] Joplin, Missouri #:4268 Z:
From: G4UEQ@GB7SYP.#19.GBR.EU
To : FREQ@GBR
Hello All,
Well obviosley the term used should be Mcs, because this was the first
term to be used,otherwise it is change just for the sake of change.
Not only can this lead to all sorts of nasty and unnesasary things, it
also pointless, and usually done by someone with nothing better to do
and usually using taxpayers money to do it.
Anyway as far as I know, in this country we still measure in miles
feet and inches et/c, so while on the subject let us refer to the
bands in yards rather than metres.
Or is that Mcs instead of Mhz
73/S All TERRY G4UEQ.
Read previous mail | Read next mail
| |
